Does MobileMe’s Push Email Really “Push?”

When Steve Jobs first announced “push email” for the upcoming iPhone 2.0 software, I was skeptical.  The two protocols I knew of, POP3 and IMAP, operate on a protocol that is always initiated by the client.  The user has to continuously check in with the server to see if new messages have arrived.  With POP3 and IMAP, you can approximate push email by polling server several times a minute.  I figured that Exchange supported some sort of persistent connection that allowed push, but from the way it was presented at Steve’s keynote, it seemed that they were touting push email for any mail account accessed by an iPhone.  I wrote off “push email” as a marketing ploy.  Im my mind, the mail server would have to know where the client was at all times to “push” updates.

Well, it turns out that MobileMe supports Push-IMAP, a relatively new protocol.  The way it works is a client logs into the MobileMe server with a long-lived HTTPS connection.  Through this connection, the client sends any updates to the server.  The server sets up a long-lived response to send back notifications of new messages.  Data is compressed to help lower bandwidth requirements.  P-IMAP is an open protocol and a P-IMAP to IMAP bridge can be set up to allow legacy mail servers to provide push services.  In addition to email updates, P-IMAP allows other data, such as contacts and calendars to be synchronized.

What seems surprising to me is that Apple is going to have to set up a system that will have to handle millions (well, at least thousands) of simultaneous connections.  Let’s hope they can do it!

So, is MobileMe’s push really “push?”  Well, technically, no.  The client still has to initiate and maintain a connection to the server.  If the server kept track of what IP address each iPhone had and initiated connections out to each iPhone, it would be a true push system.  In reality it’s a more scalable way to handle continuous polling.

 

More information:

P-IMAP

Linux Editor Update

Well, no sooner than I had written the previous article, did I consider NetBeans.  At this point I was willing to try anything, so I downloaded the special Ruby distribution and gave it a whirl.  One of the prereqs was the Java 1.6 runtime, a hefty download.  As NetBeans opened for the first time, I was greeted with a splash screen with a progress bar inching along as various Java libraries were loaded.  This did not bode well!  My bloat-meter was starting to register.  

However, once NetBeans was up and running, I found it to be pretty intuitive and it runs very well.  Response to input is instantaneous and the editor does a good job of not getting in the way.  I really enjoy the SVN integration as well.  It’s very easy to ignore files and perform the usual updates/commits.  The merging tool has some of the slickness of Apple’s FileMerge and many of the features of my favorite diff tool, Beyond Compare.

My only beef so far is that auto-complete is invoked with CTRL+space and I don’t think you can map it to TAB and still be able to use TAB for its original purpose.  The autocomplete also only works by selecting items from a drop-down.  It won’t just guess what you want.  

But overall, NetBeans has been my favorite Linux text editor for Rails.  However, I think I’ll have to stick with gedit or Eclipse for my Perl editing.

Happiness

A book I still have to read is [ed. I think it was called] The Science of Happiness whose author was interviewed recently on NPR.  The interviewers discussed the emerging branch of psychology that is studying happiness.  It got me thinking about how perceived happiness is a major market factor and how people now days are more willing to pony up extra cash and make an effort to buy your product or service if it causes them some happiness beyond the satisfaction of having a need met.  

There are so many examples of this:

Apple is the most obvious candidate.  Sure, you can buy and build a computer using the same parts Apple does for half the cost.  You can install Linux for free or pay for Windows and get your work done.  Why are people paying more for Macs?  The Mac OS and Apple’s software suites offer a more user-friendly and, ultimately, satisfying experience.  Apple’s users (like me) are happier.  

37 Signals recently posted about Zingerman’s deli in Ann Arbor and the philosophies they follow that make them a great company.  Yes, you pay $20 for a reuben and a root beer, but the experience of going to the deli outshines many other casual eating experiences.  Customers are showered with free samples of exotic foods and the staff are very personable.  The selection of products is also far beyond what you’d find in many other places.

This also brings to mind Ruby on Rails.  There are plenty of other MVC frameworks out there that do the same exact thing as Rails.  But there are so many positive externalities that Rails offers that put it above the rest: the community, the Ruby language itself, and the way agile development is baked into the framework and its related plugins.  It really makes for a pleasant development experience.

The bottom line is that Americans are becoming more willing to pay for products that make them feel better.  This has positive repercussions where a product can benefit the natural environment or society as a whole.  The challenge is to build a brand that offers that extra bit of happiness and (ideally) really does change the world for the better.